A Black Feminism | Womanism Blog

Monthly Archives: June 2011

Most Black women having it tough in life might fantasize about being rich, living in a penthouse or big fancy macmansion, going on shopping sprees, dining at expensive restaurants, drinking wine and champagne and eating chocolates, spending the day on yachts and at spas and in “exotic” locales, getting a hot guy to romance over.

Every time my mom said we were going to move, I used to fantasize about living in a big house with my own room, a big canopy bed, a little balcony, pretty lamps, wallpaper that I could write on and paint whatever color I wanted, and a big back yard. It never happened and has never been close to happening.

You know what I fantasize about now?

I fantasize about romantic writing and fantasy writing for Black audiences. I imagine Black people in situations usually reserved for white heroes in the movies and in the books. I fantasize worlds where Black people and other people of color are more than just sidekicks, foils, cheap caricatures, the butt of racist, insensitive jokes, and support characters. And we don’t have to sell our heritage to get it all.

Of course I realize that conceptualizing such things might be too over-the-top for Black folks or anachronistic and counter-cultural. I think about that all the time. But that doesn’t mean that I don’t imagine it and write it. Even if there’s no one gathered around me at story time to hear my tales, I know I’m damn good at writing what I write and I want people to listen and appreciate it and talk about it.

Again, this post was inspired by a comment I read on SheWrites by a fellow member. Positing the question ‘can’t black folks be happy?’, she was basically saying that she wasn’t encouraging complete escapism for Black readers. I realize I was a little offended by what she might have been suggesting because, whether or not she was talking about what I’d shared about my story, she wrote it after reading what I shared about my story. It made me hesitate in my writing, a story over 137-pages that I’ve picked up again after two years of letting it lay still. This fictional story begins with a group of privileged young people encroaching upon their own religious ceremonies for entering adulthood when they get a new student in their class from the lower class district of their town. The story then centers around this working class/poor girl who was brought from the lower part of town and for what purpose; it’s about how she ends up going on a frightening and empowering adventure to discover her destiny in what begins only as her taking the opportunity to go to school and save her mother from poverty and her friend from forced servitude after she is kidnapped. Yes, there’s a magical and divine element to the story. Yes, there are faeries, demons, angels, and ghosts. Yes, there are fantastical locales like enchanted groves, snowy mountains, and mountaintops that divine entities inhabit. Yes there are fabled structures like palaces, courts, and castles. Yes, there are issues of sexual violence, classism, racism, sexuality animal rights, religion, politics, and sexism. Yes, my hero(ine) is Black and working class. It’s a busy story, but its busy for the purpose of not only entertaining but stimulating the intellect of conscious and creative-minded readers.

Do I see whole scores of Black people buying my writing? No. I wish, they would but I don’t think they will. A lot of Black where I’m from still believe that its “white” to like reading and learning.

Do I think I’m a great escapist? Hell yes, I’ve been through a lot in my life and sometimes I want some slack.

Do I seek to escape who I am as a working class/poor Black woman of the South?

The answer is a resounding no. I believe in transference. How do I write fiction, carrying my whole self—culture, sexuality, race, history, class, gender, beliefs, energy/spirit, experiences, and the spirit of my ancestors—with me? How does what I know become the ink I use to write what I can imagine?

No, I’m not for everybody. No, I’m not like the average Black writer or artist. But I don’t want my work to be labeled as escapist because I believe my talent and skill, my spirit and originality, my race and ethnicity, gives my writing sincerity and edge.

ever more,

Ms. Queenly


Even though I have more than 100 posts across the three of my blogs without counting relevant triple or double posts, this is my 98th post here on Ms. Queenly’s Blog! YAAAY!!!!

onwards,

MsQ


I recently posted a few comments at SheWrites on a very good new post discussing why Black people don’t have happy endings in much of their writing. In my experience, the majority of the Black writer’s market is comprised of legacy of slave narratives, concrete jungle/urban fiction defeatism writing, and (unsolicited) self-help/advice books. In a small corner of a marginalized market overflowing with this kind of literature, there are small isolated corners where you find Octavia Butler, L.A. Banks’ paranormal stuff, and Zane’s self-proclaimed erotica. Those are the most popular names that have reached me.

I asked in this discussion, Why does this seem to be the literary limits of the Black imagination in this day and age? I mean it’s one thing to make our experiences known and honor our ancestors and the experiences of our peoples, but it’s completely another thing to continue to write pain, suffering, and oppression into existence as if it is the only thing that exists for us, or, rather, that can exist for us.

The slave narrative writings, though today they are presented as proof and documentation of Black people’s history with slavery, were mostly bought and read by white people, who didn’t allow Black people to learn how to read. Urban fiction, while it may convey the realities of many Black people, is often ladled in defeatism, i.e. the kid who wants to go to college ends up becoming a drug dealer in his own community or the precious Black girl is a survivor of abuse forced into the hard life of prostitution. Even though it’s reality, a rallying cry for change with its truth even, continuing to write only these genres is just another cage, another trap for us as minorities, I argue this all the way.

Limiting ourselves only to these genres chains our imaginations and leaves the opportunities that our people have fought for by the wayside, off the beaten path, and out of sight. You know, I don’t imagine that my ancestors were sitting around after a day of back-breaking labor in the slave quarters, going, “Lawd, I hope my daughter don’t have to pick no cotton one day but can sit up in her apartment in the ghetto and write her some stories about Black girls and fairies”. But I do believe that they fought and survived so that I could do that if I wanted to even if they couldn’t imagine it.

How many Black people do you see who go, Hey I’m not white but I think Harry Potter is kind of interesting or I don’t tell anybody, but I’m really into Star Gate SG-1 and Star Trek and shit?

Not many, huh?

We keep limiting ourselves only to what we think is culturally “Black enough”.

I was always afraid to say that I watched and read these kind of things and imagined Black people in them because I knew others would make fun of me. I like Star Gate SG-1, even though there’s only that one Black guy, even though my mom’s more into Star Trek. I like certain aspects of Harry Potter. I like anime, J-Pop/J-Rock, fantasy and romantic fiction, string music, hard rock, and a whole plethora of things that aren’t considered traditionally “Black”. And I AM Black. I can still enjoy the fantastical elements from time to time and push even those boundaries in my own imagination.

I guess I’m just writing this because after posting, I realize how frustrated I am with the writer’s market again. I realize how limited I feel as a Black woman writer and how trapped I feel in what I can get published and recognized for. What’s more, I feel mired in this reality that we will never grow as a peoples if we continue to confine ourselves to what we think is “black enough” for us instead of seeing ourselves in different places while carrying our culture with us or using our identities to create and map new worlds in our writing—this concept of transference. I want to write about poverty, urbanity, fairies, angels, demons, boggarts, cybernetic entities, deep space, other galaxies and dimensions, the realm of BDSM, psychological thrillers, horror, erotica/pornography/romantica/romance, LBGTQQIA, ableism, politics, the futuristic, etc. etc.

AND

I want my people to listen to me and want them to hear my stories instead of thinking my writing a bunch of white bullshit. Because I’m not just writing for me.

I’m writing for us.

My writing is not escapist or white-washed, and I don’t go for the cliché HEA (happily ever after).

My writings, my artworks, are prolific, amazing, and fantastical. I’m constantly scratching my head and banging it up against the wall and wondering how I’m going to get out there and get noticed, even if it’s just too or three people who get what I’m trying to do! It’d be nice if there were more but one is plenty. If I inspire or speak to one person at first, that’s wonderful. My head-banging won’t have been in vain.

There’s a saying by Latina author Sandra Cisneros in her book Caramelo: “Tell me a story, even if it’s a lie”.

Our fiction-writing doesn’t have to be lies or forcibly contrived, but I argue that in order to experience new realities in our world we have to create new realities for our world. That means looking back while walking forward, acknowledging our struggles and realities, and always, always continuing to dream and imagine.

We can’t just keep sitting on our asses and going, Ooo, when is the next Soul Food and Tyler Perry movie coming out (although these are important too)? I am prolific writer, and I, for one, want more, more, MORE! For my passion, for my hungry soul.

Forever real,

Ms. Queenly


For me, in this day and age, I feel like its ridiculous that I even have to type this and address this as an issue. Maybe I’m just ahead of my time. Too far in the future, I guess. But here it goes.

I’m just going to run through this real quick because, honestly, it reminds me of too many painful experiences in college and growing up in Atlanta.

Conversations like this remind me why I don’t celebrate the 4th of July:

My friend recently sent me an e-mail talking about some CBS thing he saw on Mark Twain’s Huckleberry Finn and use of the word “nigger” in schools. America, rethink your American classics and stop trying to justify your racist history.

I am Black and I can’t change the fact that I’m Black, no matter how much skin lightener or off-color foundation, concealer, and makeup powder I use, no matter how much I straighten my hair. I don’t want to. I am exactly the way the creator intended me to be.

The word ‘nigga’ and nigger are NOT the same as the words ‘queer’ and ‘gay’, which have always had alternate meanings. The word ‘nigger’ has never had any other meaning or purpose than to tear down an entire race of people. Its never been anything but negative. Throughout its entire history, the word ‘nigger’ has never meant anything other ‘you low Black person of African descent, stay in the place we have made for you’. And I could say worse than that and I’ve heard worse than that.

Dyke, faggot, queer, gay—all these words had different meanings before somebody came along and started using them to harm and degrade. From my understanding after reading a little Inga Muscio, even the word ‘cunt’ had a different meaning a long time ago.

The word ‘nigger’ can never claim such a thing.

Even if people started calling each other ‘toothbrush’ and meant something horrible and derogatory by it, a toothbrush would still be a toothbrush. However, the word ‘nigger’/nigga (adding an ‘a’ still doesn’t make it right) will always mean the same thing. It will always carry with it that same gut-wrenching sense of lowness that I find very painful to confront.

Having lived in Black communities my whole life, I would say that there are less Black people who use the word nigger/nigga or its derivatives gratuitously or even in a friendly fashion. Actually…I don’t know if that’s true. The people upstairs from me use this word all the time.

……. -_- ………

Let me say this instead: Most of the people that you will hear using this word are Black men, who find it empowering for some reason and claim that Black people are ‘taking the word back’. When Black people use this word it is because they have never been taught any different. It’s like trying to teach somebody who has been locked inside their entire life that the sky outside is blue. We live in a world where Black people, as an entire race, are constantly being degraded and dehumanized just for being born Black/brown/of African descent. It is a way of conditioning and socializing and it is in everything. I think people should name themselves but do so wisely, taking into consideration the history and meaning of the word. I personally do not call anyone nigger, and its hard to help/expect other Black people do the same because most of them just don’t know any different and the use of the word arises of a sort of hopelessness with our collective and individual condition. That word embodies a lot of the devaluation forced on Black people as a race and when people tell you that you’re nothing and treat you like you’re nothing for 300-500 years plus then you take in that sense of worthlessness and hatred. This is the only excuse I can offer for why they do it. This is the only explanation in my mind.

Because I am a smart thoughtful Black woman, I don’t tend to get a lot of attention. Come to think of it, I’ve never actually been called a nigger/nigga by another Black person. So why is it that I am constantly witnessing Black people call each other nigga/nigger and Latinos and whites call Black people this? I don’t know. I really don’t fucking know. It is just something that I am forced to watch and not be able to do anything about.

Don’t call me ‘Negro’, don’t call me ‘nigga’, don’t call me ‘nigger’, don’t call me ‘colored’, don’t call me ‘slave’, and you’d better be careful with the tone in which you use the word ‘Black’. Yes, with an uppercase ‘B’, not a lowercase ‘b’–that’s the writer talking.

Its enough that we use it amongst ourselves but it just makes the whole state of the matter worse when you have dope-fresh-white boy or ignorant Japanese person coming in and complicating the issue because he thinks its cool to use this word and he’s so liberal and existentialist that he’s going to argue with me about why its okay that he can use this word.

So let me say this only once:

A. You cannot ‘take back’ a word that was never yours in the first place.

B. You cannot ‘take back’ a word that is a negative derivative of another word.

C. You should let these kinds of words die where they are so that any idiots who uses the word fifty to one-hundred years or more from now to degrade a person of African descent or anybody else, even as a joke, feels like the idiot that they truly are.

D. FYI, misguided R&B singers (Usher but who listens to him anymore) and rappers do not speak for the entire Black race, contrary to popular belief.

The word ‘nigga’ or ‘nigger’ will never be a word that lifts me up. Unless I’m deliberately being insulting, I do not typically use this word (I think the correct term now is a ‘Kanye moment’….) and I don’t expect anyone else to either. Don’t like it? Then you’re messing with the wrong one. I’m trying to get some revolution here and that’s a standard I hold all people to.

I can only hope that two hundred, three hundred years from now no one is using this word and therefore no one is having this damn conversation.

rant over, for real,

MsQ


reinventing the wheel

to try to keep you–

entertained,

well-fed,

pleasured,

proud,

comfortable,

tryin’ to make you feel like a man,

for another five minutes

for another hour

hopefully

for eternity

or until death do us part

like in the Bible

put a ring on it

PLEASE

I’m begging you baby

please

put a ring on it

if you like it

bending and scraping

upgrading my wardrobe,

wearing less than I’d like

and breaking my back

in those heels

a trophy on your arm at the club

in front of your people,

your homeboys checkin’ me

cookin’ and cleanin’

constantly inventing new ways

to make you mine and keep you mine

searching on the internet

reading self-help books writtern by men (Steve Harvey, anyone?)

in the bedroom,

outta the bedroom

all to find out

that if a man

doesn’t want be kept

he won’t be kept

that privilege was given to him

the day he was born

with the imaginary crown

on the head of his cock

well I’ll say it again:

if a man

doesn’t want be kept

he won’t be kept

that goes without saying

Poets Commentary: There’s nothing you can do to keep a man once he makes up his mind not to be kept. Most likely, he didn’t want to be kept in the first place. Most people don’t like to be alone and others take advantage of that desperation or that desire to have a specific somebody or specific type of somebody. You can’t let people lead you around by your nose. You either have to find what truly want, unconditionally, or get over whatever it is that’s ailing you and holding you back and allowing you to be manipulated; rise clean up above it.

From the view point of a Black woman, having grown up in the South, what I find that rings a little true with me is how in my community, some women really do believe they can control men’s behavior. Its a human flaw, not just a Black woman’s flaw. Call it pussy power, Beyonce’s brand of feminism, whatever you wanna call it–you can’t force or influence somebody in a dominant position into doing something they ain’t gonna do.

We have to stop giving chase.

ever more real,

~Queen~


Keep in mind that I am writing this under the premise that:

A. People can do whatever they want with their money.

B. A is true especially if we’re stupid enough to give them our money.

C. Regardless and irregardless of A and B, should minority celebrities who get tons of money be more political with regards to their racial/ethnic communities?

Whether they want to or not, Black celebrities represent Black people when they rise to stardom. Black people and non-Black people view them this way. I think this is part of the legacy left to us by prominent Black male thinkers like W.E.B. Dubois and Booker T. Washington. In the case of DuBois, his concept of the so-called “talented tenth” has had a tremendous effect on Black people through history (in my view, unfortunately). I see his concept as this: ’Only one in ten’ Black men are either naturally inclined or able to become the most intelligent and the most influential among our race and should be hoisted onto our shoulders to represent us.

Although DuBois’s theory claims that character and knowledge, not wealth, are the defining characteristics of this ‘talented tenth’, pulling the term out academia, I definitely think the contemporary ‘talented tenth’ are Black entertainers and they are definitely not all men.

You hear it in the lyrics of rappers, the famous, the infamous, and the little known.

Money = power.

At least in a capitalist free market economy that masks and idealizes itself as a democratic institution.

So I guess what I’m trying to say is…rich Black celebrities are taking our money but many of them aren’t doing much for Black people as a whole.

Why is it that white people who are actors and other types of entertainer become presidents and sometimes powerful political figures yet the case is different for Black celebrities?

Also, it never seems to cross Black celebrities’ minds to do anything substantial for Black communities. I’m saying this even with the understanding that just being Black and being famous means a lot.

Celebrities act as token icons for one political cause or another all the time. But are small-scale political maneuvers enough?

I’m writing this in relation to the piece I wrote about Beyoncé a few posts ago where I was talking about how I think celebrities need to be more political and take the red carpeting out of their mouths and out of their ears. I can’t say that I’m an expert, but it appears to me that the richest and most well-known Black people are in entertainment. They seem to have no real political power to change much for Black people; there’s probably no end to the amount of pushback they receive from the folks who cut the check. But it also doesn’t look like they’re trying very hard. As I said, money is political power and if they have money then they might have some power.

So the question is, should we expect rich (and maybe somewhat influential) Black celebrities to give back to Black people since part of the reason (aside from their own presumed talents) that they’re rich and famous is because of us little people? Or are they just little people too…who like spend big money but have no power at all to improve the state of Black people in America and possibly around the world?

ever more pensive yet critical,

~MsQ


A Story of Moths [butterflies.are.overrated]

a-b-c, 1-2-3, my little rhymey poem and me–Author’s Note at the bottom

I once read a story

about how butterflies

became so bright

its said that the moths

gave them their colors

and became the weird furry ones

fluttering in the night

pedestrian in hue

not all that quick or

eyecatching too

but I think I like moths better,

believe me when I say its true

once when I was a little girl

a man with a black plastic bag

gave me a captured moth

and bade me to hold it in my hands

I cupped it there

I held it as long as I could

it fluttered and bound around,

tickling me as awfully as it would

I rushed away, mostly because I was sure

that with the strange man I wasn’t supposed to be

I ran upstairs, giggling,

opened a window, and set the moth free

~

Even then I found

a lot of poetic meaning

in what had happened

I think about young girls and women

and the moth-butterfly dualism trapping

something like ugly-ducklings and swans

browns are often put down for blondes

I know my hair is dark,

My eyes and skin brown, too,

And people think that that’s plain

But I want them to know that overrating

blue eyes and blonde hair

is really really lame

brown girls are beautiful

although men treat us as oversexed and leer

or some white people and those with preferences

turn up their noses and sneer

when we try to claim our own beauty

we are met with frustration and tears

~

white girls, listen—

please look in the textbooks

to find

that some of your luck

and wealth was actually stolen from ‘our kind’

it was in a way descended from us

so please consider this before you turn up your nose

and go and tan yourself with lust

it is for this reason

that between moths and butterflies

there is very little trust

understanding your

stolen (at the very least unearned) privilege

is hard, very difficult, but an absolute must

~

Maybe my meaning is loss

Some might even find

my rhyming intellectualizing to be kind of false

this cute little poem they might very well toss

some Black girls might cuss me out

*z-snap* and walk off

saying, “Honey, I’m a butterfly, not some dull ugly

gray moth”

But before you do, listen please,

Here lies a serious message

Not an insulting tease

~

I hope my meaning is clear

in using this metaphor I don’t mean to

detract and compare

At the end I hope at least part of my meaning still
remains there

Don’t toss the poem yet!

I’ll say the rest and then I’ll be off

Yes, it true, butterflies are pretty

But this shouldn’t subtract

from their pretty sisters, the Moths!

Author’s Note: Things that flutter startle me in general, especially when I’m trapped in a room with them. Well, except for queens in their mantles, which I just find beautiful and heartening. Its something about their sudden, rapid movements that freak me out -_-. I remember once a long time ago, when we lived in this house, two or three times, a bird somehow got into our kitchen. At least butterflies distract you with “oh the pretty colors”. Moths, on the other hand, have no smokescreen for their evil sudden rapid flutterings! And they’re furry Oh and if you think I’m just making stuff up or being sensitive about the history of devaluing Black women/women of color for white women, then look up the recent controversy surrounding Psychology Today. Otherwise, its well documented historically, read some books.

That moth did tickle me something awful.

~MsQ

June 2, 2011


Hi all. I watched another of Miss Jia’s videos a couple of days ago, along with her Pepsi Max commentary. I admire the straight-forwardness of her commentary and her ability to comment on the issue as a Black woman living and experiencing. She makes the point and gets to the point, for real.

I agree about 95% or more with just about everything she’s saying in this video and how she deals with friends and acquaintances who come to her boo-hooing or complaining about being in relationships with married/”taken” men.

However, what I find funny is how everybody is quick to jump down a woman’s throat for showing weakness and giving into these fools, which I don’t condone and agree completely with Miss Jia, but hardly anybody looks to men and go, “What the heck are you doing?”

They treat men like their behavior is natural, with no questions, no analysis, no conversation, no criticism, and no accountability. Men aren’t held accountable for being conniving and playing “head games”, or manipulating women, through their desperation for sex or intimacy (they thirsty, if you know what I mean). Nobody holds men to a higher standard, as the dominant half of this detrimental gender binary, usually. Women are quickly called hoes and tramps and all kinds of “you dumb bitch”, but men…noooot so much.

I don’t know Miss Jia’s entire track record on the topic, but this is what came to mind when I saw this particular video, which my sister showed me. I agree with her and I realize that her audience is probably mostly Black women, but the situation is bigger than just women closing their legs. It takes two, it takes a village, whatever. For real change, it takes everybody involved. It can’t just be a whole prolonged women-on-strike-against-unfaithful-men thing. Personally, I’m sick of this mess from both sides.

Of course, there’s always going to be a weakest link in the “United Front of Womanhood”, or what have you. There will always be some woman (or another man) that’s willing to give a unfaithful man what he wants even if he’s a dog and not even worth it.

Still, its a two-way thing. Women need to hold men to a higher standard of treatment and behavior, cutting off a supply of desperate, misguided women that’s willing to put up with their shyt. In capitalist terms, cut off or discontinue the usual supply and the demand will have to change. Most men just need to change, period–stop looking to women’s body to prove and test your masculinity and to selfishly satisfy your own body and ego.

pipe dreams all around,

Ms. Queenly


I knew from the moment I read the words “Fucking exotic men is a pastime” that I was in for a world of numb, uncontrollable nausea and angst. Because an article that starts off “Fucking exotic men is a pastime” isn’t much different in my book from “Fucking exotic women is a pastime”.

The link to the article is at the end of this post.

Some [Black] women might think that this was a juicy hot read. I still feel a little sick that I read this article from a Black woman. I just got my own Twitter less than a week ago. Loren has hundreds of followers on Twitter, so it probably wasn’t a big deal to her, but she lost one follower today over this hot mess. Like Lauryn Hill says in her song, “Lost Ones” on The Miseducation of Lauryn Hill: you might win some but you just lost one.

No, Arielle Loren, no. Putting ‘exotic’ in quotations or mentioning your own heritage/identities/subjectivities doesn’t change the fact that objectifying people because of their nationality or otherwise origins is still objectification. Reciprocating the exotifying of men like they are a specific brand of Ferrari makes me numb-nauseus. If a white woman talked about a western African Black man’s “thick penis” and says she likes to date non-American Black men, that’s objectification, exotification, and sensualizing a group of people so is it any different because the woman saying these things identifies as Black?

The whole tone of the article is mature, sophisticated even, to be sure, but trying to class up objectification like its sensual, worldly, and cosmopolitan then trying to intellectualize about it is just– excuse me while  go vomit.

She qualified the article by asking at the end, How do you feel about dating “exotic” men? Is the attraction politically incorrect or an innocent symptom of curiosity? Speak on it.

To answer the question, no, there’s nothing wrong with the attraction is the sense that you can’t help what you’re attracted to most of the time. The only way to grow is by experiencing trying to understand why you feel and think as you do so you can continue to grow. No, curiosity is not the problem. The better question is this: How do feel about objectifying non-American Black men and then intellectualizing about it and then asking others to discuss it in a public forum?

Did I not just get through writing a post on how men openly and unapologetically discriminate against women based on race and defend it as “preference”? If you could say there’s a female equivalent, then this article by Arielle Loren is it. It doesn’t make it that much different because a woman is doing it to a man.

Honesty in this case just turned me off completely. And I usually appreciate honesty.

I want to affirm Black women’s experiences and honor their voices and thoughts.They are my sisters and I love them even if they don’t know me. Its true that you’re not going to like or desire everybody and are going to want certain things in an intimate or even in the people who are around you. But I can’t affirm nor honor this perpetuation of a vicious cycle of objectification. Call it preference, call it whatever you want–I am not with whatever this is. It doesn’t sit right inside me.

Maybe I’m being righteous and this is just the world. Some women find power in doing to men the same things they do to women. I don’t know. It just doesn’t ring right to be treated like an animal at the zoo (and that’s a whole other conversation to be had).

on exhibit,

Ms. Queenly

Read the “Sexing the Exotic” by Arielle Loren article @ Clutch Magazine

Read A Man’s Right to Preference–Racist


This is the place where they held you down

raped you beat you and spit on you

this is the place where they held you down

…and this is the place where you fought back

–Ms. Queenly, Daybreak Mosaic (a work in progress)

Do I think its wrong to shoot a man who raped you?

Are you asking me without the usual who-are-you-to-decide-someone’s-fate judgement call comeback?

Really?

Then my answer is no.

Rape is probably the worst thing that one person can do to another person in my book and its never okay, no matter how skankily someone was dressed or how slutty their demeanor appears. No one is asks to be raped, no matter how tastelessly they might dressed or how lude they behave.

The song is ambiguous. There’s a hundred different direction in which the plot of the video could have gone. I, for one, think Rihanna picked the best one, and, by “best”, I mean one of the most political ones I can think of, especially for women.

I’m not one to pat celebrities on the back for putting two and two together and finally giving their songs and videos some political meaning every once in a while. However, I must really applaud the producers and Rihanna for this, if only because some people are making a big deal out of it. Wasn’t I just “complaining” about how artists like Beyonce misappropriate/suggest a political message but never proactively do anything political with their music? Maybe Rihanna is just trying to get attention, but they chose to portray this story and that says a lot.

Why are they making a big deal out of it? Who’s to say. Are they mad that the video is a about a woman shooting a man in public? Are they outraged that Rihanna’s character took justice into her own hands for herself?

You can criticize the video for all types of reasons. I mean, why in the hell should I congratulate Rihanna for prancing around in her expensive little outfits and “playing” the part of a rape survivor? Why should I join the media hype over yet another celebrity? Should we really be nodding our heads that Rihanna’s character murdered someone in public? What if it’s all just a gimmick?

Still, the video could have been about something else and it has become something more because of the highly political and serious nature of the message. I mean, people are pulling this video off the air. Men objectify women, especially those who are sex workers like dancers, strippers, and prostitutes all the time in rap videos, glorifying covert and overt forms of sexual violence and abuse, and nobody’s pulling their videos off the air. Snoop Dogg, Nelly, Dr. Dre, Lil’ Wayne, Jay-Z. All they do/did is edit and censor it or show it at a later time in the night instead of on daytime television.

A female artist, a woman of color, makes one video about shooting the man who brutally raped and beat her and people just lose their minds.

In my fictional writing, I murder rapists on a steady basis. Its one of the only times I feel that I am empowered to fight back for the women and children and men who are survivors and victims of this heinousness–by writing. Because in reality, there’s nothing I can do directly. So naturally, I’m all for this fictional but symbolic character that Rihanna portrays in the music video “Man Down”. I know that many people who are survivors of rape and sexual abuse and people who the family, friends, and supporters of victims of this act don’t think badly of the video and have maybe even had such thoughts themselves, more than you might think. In my writing, I’m all an eye-for-an-eye type of sorts on this topic.

If a man raped me, would I shoot him, in public, in plain sight? Well let’s just hope I never have to find out.

Do I blame women who retaliate against their attackers?

Hell naw.

I’m out,

Ms. Queenly



Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 34 other followers